Identification of Leading Sector Priorities and Spatial Interactions as Effort to Increase The Economic Growth Rate of Bondowoso District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53572/ejavec.v4i2.33Keywords:
DLQ, LQ, Overlay, Shift Share, Spatial InteractionAbstract
Bondowoso Regency is one of the regions categorized as underdeveloped because the average value of growth rate during 2010-2019 is below the average value of the growth rate of East Java Province which is 5.38% while the East Java Province reaches 5.82%. In addition, the GDP value of Bondowoso regency is in the 8th lowest rank of all regencies / cities in East Java and ranks 2nd in the area of Besuki residence. The economic structure of Bondowoso Regency is dominated by the primary sector with a contribution of 37.4%. As a region that has a strategic area, sectoral development planning is needed by setting sector priorities that must be developed based on competitive advantage and industrial competitiveness and determination of spatial interaction. This research is a type of descriptive quantitative research with the data used are secondary time-series data from 2010-2019. Data taken from Bondowoso’s Cental of Statictis Institution and East Java’s Cental of Statictis Institution. To meet the research objectives there are several analytical tools used including LQ, DLQ, Shift-Share, Growth Ratio Model. Overlay Analysis, Sectoral Typology, Gravitation Model, Spider Chart analysis, and Williamosn Index. Based on the use of a combination of LQ, MPR, Overlay, Sectoral Typology it is known that there are 7 leading sectors namely agriculture, forestry and fisheries; government administration, defense and mandatory social security sectors; education service sector; other service sectors; health service sector and social activities; information and communication sector; financial services and insurance sector. Based on the combination of the Shift Share, DLQ, MPR, Overlay and Sectoral Typology analysis tools, it is known that there are sectors that are expected to become leading sectors in the short, medium and long term. The result shows that Bondowoso district has highest interaction value than other district and disparities value of Bondowoso is classified in low disparity.
References
Abidin. (2015). Aplikasi Analisis Shift Share Pada Transformasi Sektor Pertanian Dalam Pere konomian Wilayah di Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Informatika Pertanian, (24)02
Amalia.F. (2012). Penentuan Sektor Unggulan Perekonomian Wilayah Kabupaten Bone Bolan go dengan Pendekatan Sektor Pembentuk PDRB. Jurnal Etikonomi, (11)2
Arsyad, Lincoln. (1999). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan . STIE YKPN
Badan Pusat Statiktik Kabupaten Bondowoso. (2020). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Menurut Lapangan Usaha ADHK 2010-2019, BPS Kabupaten Bondowoso
Damayanti. A. (2019). Model Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia: Peranan Ketergantuan Spa sial. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunana Indonesia (19)01
Darzal, D. (2016). Analisis Disparitas Pendapatan Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya Di Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 4(2), 131- 142
Emalia.Z. dan Farida.I. (2018). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Interaksi Spasial di Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, (19)01
Fujita, M., & Krugman, P. (2004). The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. In Fifty years of regional science (pp. 139-164). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Fujita, N. (2007). Myrdal’s theory of cumulative causation. Evolutionary and Institutional Eco nomics Review, 3(2), 275-284.
Glasson, John. (1990). Pengantar Perencanaan Regional. Terjemahan Paul Sihotang.Jakarta: LPFEUI.
Gurgul.H. dan Lach.L. (2011). The Impcat of Regional Disparities on Economic Growth. Opera tional Research and Decisions, (02)
Hakim, R. B., & Utami, L. Y. (2015). Identifikasi Promosi Kesehatan Menggunakan Metode Clus tering di Provinsi Jawa Tengah.
Hiadayati.S. (2017). Analisis Sektor Basis dan Sektor Unggulan Sebagai Pendorong Pertum buahan dan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Kota Tanjungpinang (Tahun 2012-2016).
Husna. N, Noor. I, Rozikin. M. (2013). Analisis Pengembangan Potensi Ekonomi Lokal Untuk Menguatkan Daya Saing Daerah Di Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), (1)1
Imelda, I., Nurjayanti, N., & Ochtadila, S. E. (2013). Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan Dan Daer ah Hinterland Kota Palembang. Laporan Penelitian Fakultas Ekonomi, 1-30.
Marpaung. Y. T. F., Hutagol. P., Limbong. WH., Kusnadi. N. (2011). Perkembangan Industri Gula Indonesia dan Urgensi Swasembada Gula Nasional. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics, (02)01
Muhtar, G. A. (2018). Pertarungan dan Evolusi antara Sains Regional dan Geografi Ekonomi. Jur nal Azimut, 1(I), 37-45.
Muljarijadi, B. (2017). Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah: Pendekatan Analisis Tabel Input-Out put. UNPAD PRESS.
Myrdal, G., & Sitohang, P. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions.
Nazipawati. (2007). Aplikasi Model Static Dan Dynamic Location Quotients Dan Shift Share Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Regional (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ulu Provinsi Sumatera Selatan). Jurnal Eko-Regional, (2)2
Nijkamp P dan Poot J. (1998). Spatial Perspectives on New Theories of Economic Growth. An nals of Regional Science, (32)1:7-32
Nurhayani, N., & Bhakti, A. (2015). Analisis Disparitas Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Hubungan nya dengan Investasi di Provinsi Jambi Tahun 2002-2014. Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 10(2).
Panorama, M. (2013). Disparities in Economic Development: In South Sumatera, Indonesia. In 2013 International Conference on the Modern Development of Humanities and Social Science (pp. 79-81). Atlantis Press.
Richardson, H.W. (1991). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Ekonomi Regional. Lembaga Penerbit FEUI. Jakarta.
Rustiadi. (2017).Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor In donesia
Samuelson.P.A., Nordhaus., dan William D. (2001). Ilmu Makro Ekonomi. Jakarta PT. Media Edukasi.
Suradi. (2012). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Sosial (Economic Growth and Social Welfare). Jurnal Informasi, (17)03
Suryawan.H.D, Hanim.A, dan Yualiti.L,. (2015). Analisis Potensi Dan Daya Saing Sektoral Di Kabupaten Situbondo. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa 2015
Sjafrizal, & Elfindri. (2008). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi. Baduose Media.
Tarigan, Robinson. (2005). Ekonomi Regional-Teori dan Aplikasi Edisi Revisi. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Tarigan,Robinson. (2015). Ekonomi Regional. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Tiebout C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, (64), 416-424
Wahyuningtyas.R., Rusgiyono A., dan Wilandari.Y,. (2013). Analisis Sektor Unggulan Menggu nakan Data PDRB (Studi Kasus BPS Kabupaten Kendal Tahun 2006-2010). Jurnal Gauss ian, (2)3
Wijaya.B., dan Atmanti.H.D,. (2006). Analisis Pengembangan Wilayah dan Sketor Potensial Guna Mendorong Pembangunana di Kota Salatiga. Jurnal Ekonomi Perencanaan.
Yusuf.M. (1999). Model Rasio Pertumbuhan Sebagai Salah Satu Alat Analisis Alternatif Dalam Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, (XLVII)02
