Economic Recovery Efforts: Boosting East Java’s Export Performance Through Mapping The Competitiveness of Commodities

Authors

  • M. Fahmi Priyatna Magister Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Publik (MPKP), Universitas Indonesia
  • Sonia Anggun Andini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53572/ejavec.v5i2.64

Keywords:

RCA, CMSA, Trade, FSI in East Java

Abstract

As an effort to encourage the export performance of East Java, concrete and comprehensive information and mapping are needed regarding the level of competitiveness of export commodities and their future prospects. This is necessary so that policy makers can devise the right strategy in each category of commodity competitiveness. To map the competitiveness of commodities and their prospects in the future, this study uses a combined technique of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and Constant Market Share Analysis (CMSA). RCA demonstrates static competitiveness at one time period (2020), while CMSA represents dynamic competitiveness in two time periods (2016 and 2020). With the merger of these two methods, East Java export commodities are divided into four categories, namely great amounting to 426 commodities, sunset amounting to 426 commodities, sunrise amounting to 649 commodities, and poor amounting to 919 commodities. The optimization of the four categories can be divided into two major parts of international cooperation, there are through the expansion of trade exports for the great and sunrise categories, as well as efforts to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) for the sunset and poor categories.

References

Amador, J., & Cabral, S. (2008). The Portuguese export performance in perspective: A constant market share analysis. Banco de Portugal Economic Bulletin, 14(3), 201.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2021). Perkembangan Ekspor dan Impor Indonesia. [Diunduh 21 Juni 2021]. Tersedia pada: https://www.bps.go.id/.

Barth, R., Hemphill, W., et al. (2000). Financial Programming and Policies: The Case of Turkey. [Diunduh 23 Mei 2021]. Tersedia pada: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/nft/2000/Turkey/index.htm.

Kementerian Perdagangan. (2014). Laporan Akhir Kajian Penyusunan Strategi Pengendalian Impor Indonesia 2015-2019. Jakarta:Pusat Kebijakan Luar Negeri

Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2003). International economics: Theory and policy (6th Edition). Addison Wesley.

Muharami, G., & Novianti, T. (2018). Analisis Kinerja Ekspor Komoditas Karet Indonesia ke Amerika Latin. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 6(1), 15-26

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Glossary of Statistical Term: Competitiveness. [diunduh 21 Juni 2021]. Tersedia pada: https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=399

Tambunan, T. (2001). Perekonomian Indonesia: teori dan temuan empiris. Ghalia Indonesia.

Trade statistics for international business development (Trademap). (2021). [Diunduh 21 Juni 2021]. Tersedia pada: htpps://www.trademap.org

Tyers, R. P. Phillips and D. Lim. 1985. ASEAN-Australia Trade in Manufactures; A Constant Market Share Analysis, 1970-1979. In Lim,D. (ed). 1985. ASEANAustralia Trade in Manufactures. Logman Chashire, Melbourne.

Verico, K. (2017), Indonesia towards 2030 and beyond: A Long-Run International Trade Foresight, MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany

Wahono, U. (2015). Daya Saing Ekspor Tuna Kaleng Indonesia di Uni Eropa Tahun 2003-2013. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 4(4), 427-434.

World Bank. (2021). World Bank Commodity Price Data (The Pink Sheet). [Diunduh 21 Juni 2021]. Tersedia pada: https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets#1.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Priyatna, M. F. ., & Andini, S. A. (2021). Economic Recovery Efforts: Boosting East Java’s Export Performance Through Mapping The Competitiveness of Commodities. East Java Economic Journal, 5(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.53572/ejavec.v5i2.64

Issue

Section

Articles